The papers authors assert that, in any scenario, a dialogue on how to use and restrict synthetic biology methods and products must be initiated for the benefit of the worlds societies and decision makers. The authors of the essay—published in the online journal. Plos biology —include: Kent Redford of the wildlife conservation Society and Archipelago consulting; Bill Adams of the University of Cambridge; and georgina. Mace of University college london (UCL). At present, the synthetic biology and conservation communities are largely strangers to one another, even though they both share many of the same concerns and goals, said Kent Redford, lead author of the article. An open discussion between the two communities is needed to help identify areas of collaboration on a topic that will likely change the relationship of humans with the natural world. The authors of the paper, along with other scientists and conservationists, will discuss the potential implications that synthetic biology may have on the natural world and conservation at the synthetic biology and Conservation Conference, convening at Clare college in Cambridge, england, on April 9-11.
Save mother Earth: An Essay soapboxie
New paper says discussion on benefits and risks of synthetic biology to conservation is necessary. From re-creating extinct species to the risk of genetically modified super-species. Upcoming conference at Clare college in Cambridge, england, on April 9-11 will make examine the nexus of synthetic biology and conservation. Newswise — new york (Embargoed until April 2, 2013,. Eastern Time)—What effects will the rapidly growing field of synthetic biology have on the conservation of nature? The ecological and ethical challenges stemming from this question honors will require a new and continuing dialogue between members of the synthetic biology and biodiversity conservation communities, according to authors of a new paper. According to the paper, the field of synthetic biology—a discipline that utilizes chemically synthesized dna to create organisms that address human needs—is developing rapidly, with billions of dollars being invested annually. Many extol the virtues of synthetic biology as providing potential solutions to human health problems, food security, and energy needs. Advocates also see in synthetic biology tools for combating climate change and water deficits. Critics warn that genetically modified organisms could pose a danger to native species and natural ecosystems.
Of particular concern is the ruaha-rungwa ecosystem, where an estimated 8,272 elephants were found in 2014, compared to 34,664 in 2009, according to government figures. . Surprisingly, relatively few elephant carcases were spotted during surveys that would account for the decline and wildlife officials were at a loss to explain the discrepancy. Minister long nyalandu did announce a suite of measures to protect the countrys elephants, including recruitment of an additional 500 rangers this year in addition to the 500 extra already hired by the ministry of Natural Resources and tourism in 2014, better support for existing rangers. Tanzania was already under pressure to address elephant poaching and illegal trade from its fellow members of the convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild fauna and Flora (cites). . Along with a number of other African and Asia countries, tanzania was required to develop an ivory Trade Action Plan to guide its protection and enforcement efforts. While the measures announced this week by the tanzania government are welcome, there is a real risk that it could be a case of too little too late for some elephant populations, said Broad. Tanzania has been haemorrhaging ivory with ruaha-rungwa the apparent epicentre and nobody seems to have raised the alarm; it is clearly essential that the government establish exactly how this has been allowed to take place, while taking urgent and incisive action to bring the situation.
Minister for Natural Resources and tourism lazaro nyalandu book yesterday announcing the latest estimates of elephant populations in Tanzania. Traffic, en français, tanzania, june 2015 —tanzanian Minister for Natural Resources and tourism lazaro nyalandu yesterday announced the latest estimates of elephant populations in Tanzania, demonstrating a catastrophic decline over the past decade, with numbers plummeting from an estimated 109,051 in 2009 to 43,330. A government press release concluded that it was highly likely that the decline was caused by poaching for ivory. The governments figures show Tanzania lost tens of thousands of elephants over the past decade, said Steven Broad, traffics Executive director, it is incredible that poaching on such an industrial scale has not been identified and addressed before now. This news confirms concerns raised by traffic in 2013 in a report from the Elephant Trade Information System (etis which pointed to a profound shift in ivory smuggling routes to tanzania's Indian Ocean ports of Dar es Salaam and Zanzibar as the principle exit points. Latest information compiled by traffic from seizure records indicates that more ivory—at least 45 tonnes—has flowed from Tanzania to international markets in Asia than any other African country since 2009. . Forensic analyses have confirmed that seizures made in Uganda and Kenya have also involved ivory originating from Tanzania. A breakdown of elephant numbers across the country presented by minister nyalandu showed some smaller elephant populations had increased significantly, notably the elephant population list in the famed Serengeti which rose from 3,068 to 6,087 animals. However, beyond the most heavily visited, northern circuit tourist locations, elephant numbers were significantly down.
But in spite of all the advantages of recycling, there is still a lot of waste everywhere. Many people don't want to sort their rubbish. Some areas still have plenty of landfill space and no recycling centres. They find it rather expensive to transport materials for recycling to big cities. To my mind, there must be more recycling centres not only in big cities, but in small towns as well. Besides, people should be educated about the importance of recycling. In general, recycling is good for the environment. What is more, it is an interesting and profitable business. If everybody made a small effort to improve their local environment, pollution would be reduced gradually and the global situation would improve.
10 ways to save tigers - good Nature Travel
Recycling is paper an important issue nowadays. Unfortunately, people have always polluted their surroundings. The development of tomosynthesis big industrial cities has led to the concentration of huge amounts of waste into small areas. Disposal of waste has become a major problem. When rubbish is burnt, this pollutes the atmosphere. When it is buried in landfill sites, it can cause pollution of water supplies.
So the obvious solution of this problem is recycling. I strongly feel that everybody can help recycle waste by collecting litter and by sorting rubbish into different categories. Paper, glass and plastic can be sold to recycling companies. Recycled waste can be made into new products and it can help save natural resources. Some waste can also be used to produce electricity or to make soil for growing fruit and vegetables. In my opinion, it would be great if recycling centres paid people for the rubbish they brought.
Tropical rainforests are called the "world's largest pharmacy" because a lot of natural medicines have been discovered there. More than half of the world's species of plants and animals are found in rainforests. They also offer a way of life to many people living in and around the forest. What is more, rainforests are the lungs of our planet because they produce a significant amount of the world's oxygen. Unfortunately, rainforests continue disappearing. Some people say that we need more land for agriculture and more trees for timber.
They continue killing animals and picking up herbs and rare flowers. Rainforests also have value as tourism destinations. But the increasing number of tourists may damage the local environment. I strongly feel that people must be careful with nature. To conclude, if people want to be healthy and to live happily on Earth, they must preserve rainforests. I think that governments must work together with environmentalists to fight deforestation and to prevent the disappearance of "the lungs of our planet". Everybody understands that we should recycle our waste. However, most people continue disposing of it in the usual way.
Slogans on save trees - best and Catchy Slogan
To conclude, if we want to be healthy, to drink clean water and to breathe fresh air, we should take care of the father's environment and help improve our lives on mini Earth. There is a lot of discussion about the destruction of rain forests. Some people don't care about this problem, while others feel that the rain forest must be preserved. Nowadays rainforests occupy a relatively small area. One can find them in south America and Indonesia, in Thailand and Sri lanka. Worryingly, rainforests are disappearing at an alarming rate owing to deforestation, river pollution and soil erosion. Quite a lot of people still don't know what effect the destruction of the rainforest may have on the world climate. To my mind, tropical rainforests are very important for our planet because they are home to a great variety of plants, insects, birds and animals.
We can use less washing up liquids to keep the water clean. We can also plant trees, collect litter and recycle cans, bottles, plastic bags and newspapers. Besides, we can buy products that don't resume use much energy. But a lot of people still think that there is little they can do to help the environment. They are sure that it is the duty of the government and big companies to make our planet cleaner: to recycle waste materials, to protect rare animals and plants, to install antipollution equipment and. But they are wrong. Everybody must take part in reducing pollution.
to stop pollution, but they don't know if they can help. In my opinion, much can be done by an average citizen. People have to be smart about such things as driving a car or using electricity. Whenever we drive a car, we are adding greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. To make our planet cleaner and to use less energy we can try carpooling. That is when three people ride together in one car instead of driving three cars to work. We can also use public transport, ride a bike, or walk. People can save electricity by turning off lights, our tv-set and computer.
There should be more newspaper articles, tv-programs and business science-popular films about ecological problems. They help people become environment-educated. However, many people still believe that nature is doing well by itself. They use natural resources and pollute the environment, but they don't think how awful the consequences may. I'm sure that nature can't do without our help. If we want to breathe fresh air, to drink clean water and to eat healthy food, we must stop polluting the environment. To conclude, ecological problems concern everybody and there are ways to solve them. People must always remember that the earth is our home and it depends on us what it will be like. Many people think that they can't solve the world's environmental problems on their own and that the government and big companies must care about these problems.
See professor doug Tallamys great essay: Gardening for Life
Environmental Problems, some people say that we should invest money in ecology projects, while others believe that nature is doing well by itself. The earth is the only planet that people can live on, but nowadays they seem to be doing everything to make their home unfit for living. Industrialization has brought us into conflict with the natural environment. Our plget is in danger; air, water and land pollution have disastrous golf consequences which threaten human life on Earth. I strongly feel that the more money is invested in ecology projects, the better our lives are going. People have technologies to make our planet cleaner: we can control pollution, recycle waste materials, protect rare animals and plants and install antipollution equipment. We need more disaster-prevention programs in order to control environmental pollution, fight the destruction of wildlife and preserve woodlands. There should be more organizations like greenpeace that will help protect the animal world and stop environmental degradation. Such organizations influence public opinion and help form a correct attitude to nature.